Difference between revisions of "Talk:Etiquette"
From Worms Knowledge Base
Explorer09 (Talk | contribs) m |
(PACK) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
How about adding the WBA (Wall Before Attack) rule to the Scheme rules-section? I read it very often in wxw hosts, I even began to use it myself if I'm asked for rules. --[[User:Kevin04|Kevin04]] 06:03, 14 July 2008 (MST) | How about adding the WBA (Wall Before Attack) rule to the Scheme rules-section? I read it very often in wxw hosts, I even began to use it myself if I'm asked for rules. --[[User:Kevin04|Kevin04]] 06:03, 14 July 2008 (MST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === As a new page === | ||
+ | |||
+ | In my opinion "Scheme rules" should be a new page. Etiquette page should be only for etiquette, and not for rules too. Also, I think that the other rules that are not so common or are specific to a single scheme should be included in "Scheme rules" even if the page of the scheme has already everything about its rules. --[[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] 20:26, 25 January 2012 (CET) | ||
+ | EDIT: Also, I think there should be a "''Main Article: link''" written here in Etquette, since Scheme Rules belongs to Etiquette. It's like [[Shopper]] page with a link guiding to [[WxW]], which is a Shopper type. --[[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] 21:04, 26 June 2015 (CEST) | ||
== (For hosts) Don't kick players == | == (For hosts) Don't kick players == | ||
Line 7: | Line 12: | ||
Idea from [http://forum.team17.com/showthread.php?t=42294 this thread]. | Idea from [http://forum.team17.com/showthread.php?t=42294 this thread]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == PACK is irrelevant == | ||
+ | PACK shouldn't be mentioned here anymore, probs just do a redirect to the Shopper article section about rules there [[User:TheMadCharles|TheMadCharles]] ([[User talk:TheMadCharles|talk]]) 08:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:32, 15 May 2024
Scheme rules
How about adding the WBA (Wall Before Attack) rule to the Scheme rules-section? I read it very often in wxw hosts, I even began to use it myself if I'm asked for rules. --Kevin04 06:03, 14 July 2008 (MST)
As a new page
In my opinion "Scheme rules" should be a new page. Etiquette page should be only for etiquette, and not for rules too. Also, I think that the other rules that are not so common or are specific to a single scheme should be included in "Scheme rules" even if the page of the scheme has already everything about its rules. --FoxHound 20:26, 25 January 2012 (CET) EDIT: Also, I think there should be a "Main Article: link" written here in Etquette, since Scheme Rules belongs to Etiquette. It's like Shopper page with a link guiding to WxW, which is a Shopper type. --FoxHound 21:04, 26 June 2015 (CEST)
(For hosts) Don't kick players
Don't kick players. At least, you have to tell the player that you're going to kick him/her and explain the reason before you do.
Idea from this thread.
PACK is irrelevant
PACK shouldn't be mentioned here anymore, probs just do a redirect to the Shopper article section about rules there TheMadCharles (talk) 08:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)