Talk:Etiquette

Scheme rules

How about adding the WBA (Wall Before Attack) rule to the Scheme rules-section? I read it very often in wxw hosts, I even began to use it myself if I'm asked for rules. --Kevin04 06:03, 14 July 2008 (MST)

As a new page

In my opinion "Scheme rules" should be a new page. Etiquette page should be only for etiquette, and not for rules too. Also, I think that the other rules that are not so common or are specific to a single scheme should be included in "Scheme rules" even if the page of the scheme has already everything about its rules. --FoxHound 20:26, 25 January 2012 (CET) EDIT: Also, I think there should be a "Main Article: link" written here in Etquette, since Scheme Rules belongs to Etiquette. It's like Shopper page with a link guiding to WxW, which is a Shopper type. --FoxHound 21:04, 26 June 2015 (CEST)

(For hosts) Don't kick players

Don't kick players. At least, you have to tell the player that you're going to kick him/her and explain the reason before you do.

Idea from this thread.

PACK is irrelevant

PACK shouldn't be mentioned here anymore, probs just do a redirect to the Shopper article section about rules there TheMadCharles (talk) 08:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

I think the section about Scheme rules is huge already and there are a lot of scheme rules missing there. I plan on making a new page just for Scheme rules, containing all the existing rules around Worms community and its schemes, including the underground ones. However, some of the rules are common in various schemes, and other rules are especific to a single scheme. This must be clarified. Regarding PACK rules, I agree with you that they are obsolette, and this must be clarified as it is on the Shopper article. Maybe you're right, just a link to Shopper article with this section is enough. --FoxHound (talk) 15:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

here, have fun Scheme rules TheMadCharles (talk) 16:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)