Difference between revisions of "Talk:Worms Armageddon"
From Worms Knowledge Base
(→Still borked) |
(Icons) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::lolz [[User:Run!|Run!]] 03:20, 28 June 2007 (MST) | ::lolz [[User:Run!|Run!]] 03:20, 28 June 2007 (MST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Icons == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The icons for Software, Online Play, etc. are corny! That is all. --[[User:Bloopy|Bloopy]] 21:41, 10 July 2007 (MST) |
Revision as of 04:41, 11 July 2007
About "Unsorted"
I wasn't really sure if I should have made a "Macros" section (for Constipated Silkworm), because Silkworm would have to be in that section too, because of its versions before 4.00. Also, I'm not really sure of the nature of Buttfats & Parsnips, though I suspect it should go in the WormNET proxies section. Lex 13:49, 11 July 2006 (MST)
- I have changed "Unsorted" to "Misc", in correspondance to Seita's addition of a "Misc" section in the WWP 3rd-party programs section. Lex 05:07, 21 July 2006 (MST)
Online play section move
I think the "Online play" section should go by the communities section instead of where it is for the following reasons:
- It has nothing to do with the game technology, which is the section it's been placed by as of this message.
- Someone looking for community-related information would be looking past the technical articles which are the main focus of the wiki.
I really hope someone reads this. :/ Lex 05:04, 21 July 2006 (MST)
Why programmers?
Why are programmers mentioned particularly? There are many other contributers to W:A who didn't program and have provided more to the community. Why mention only programmers and not contributers in the first place. --User:Evil Bunny
- Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Blah blah blah click the edit link etc. My guess is it's because programmers are a relatively small group, it's easy to decide who belongs there, and well this wiki is currently mostly populated by programmers. If you have a more balanced way to list wormers in mind, go ahead and try it out. It's good to see you've added some non-programming info elsewhere btw. --Madewokherd 20:09, 8 October 2006 (MST)
Still borked
The page still looks borked. This is firefox 1.5, btw. It might work with versions above this.
- YES, YOU DON'T ALL HAVE TO BUG ME ABOUT YOUR STUPID BROKEN BROWSER. Also, I fixed it (with a hack, mind you). Also, sign your comments when posting comments. --Vladimir 11:19, 27 June 2007 (MST)
- lolz Run! 03:20, 28 June 2007 (MST)
Icons
The icons for Software, Online Play, etc. are corny! That is all. --Bloopy 21:41, 10 July 2007 (MST)