Difference between revisions of "User talk:The Assassin47"
From Worms Knowledge Base
CyberShadow (Talk | contribs) (I think the current consensus is that Mole Shopper is conventional) |
CyberShadow (Talk | contribs) m (oops) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:I think Mole Shopper is no less conventional than Team17 or Hysteria. The biggest thing that stands out is that it requires a non-random map, but I don't think it's as distanced from "conventional gameplay" as the other schemes there, like Golf or Walk for Weapons. | :I think Mole Shopper is no less conventional than Team17 or Hysteria. The biggest thing that stands out is that it requires a non-random map, but I don't think it's as distanced from "conventional gameplay" as the other schemes there, like Golf or Walk for Weapons. | ||
| − | :Anyway, the Schemes page has a long history of edits and revisions, and generally represents a more-or-less established consensus (although KRD [[User:KoreanRedDragon/Schemes might disagree]]). Changes should probably be discussed on the talk page first. --[[User:CyberShadow|Vladimir]] 07:20, 29 August 2011 (CEST) | + | :Anyway, the Schemes page has a long history of edits and revisions, and generally represents a more-or-less established consensus (although KRD [[User:KoreanRedDragon/Schemes|might disagree]]). Changes should probably be discussed on the talk page first. --[[User:CyberShadow|Vladimir]] 07:20, 29 August 2011 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 05:21, 29 August 2011
Hi, thank you for your participation. However, I've recently undone one of your edits, with an explanation in the edit summary ("Mole Shopper is not a roping scheme"), and you've changed it back without any explanation.
Please note the following:
- Please enter an edit summary when you make changes. It helps other editors understand your edits.
- Check the page's "history" tab before restoring a reverted edit.
- If you have any questions, ask them on the page's "discussion" tab, or on users' talk pages.
- Check the wiki's Recent changes once in a while, as some edits may be follow-ups to your edits.
--Vladimir 07:09, 29 August 2011 (CEST)
Hey Cyber. Youre right its not a roping scheme, but I was trying to place it in the Shopping schemes. Its definitely non-conventional, perhaps it should be placed in the Other Schemes section? Sorry to undo your edit, I thought maybe mine didnt save. --The Assassin47 07:13, 29 August 2011 (CEST)
- I think Mole Shopper is no less conventional than Team17 or Hysteria. The biggest thing that stands out is that it requires a non-random map, but I don't think it's as distanced from "conventional gameplay" as the other schemes there, like Golf or Walk for Weapons.
- Anyway, the Schemes page has a long history of edits and revisions, and generally represents a more-or-less established consensus (although KRD might disagree). Changes should probably be discussed on the talk page first. --Vladimir 07:20, 29 August 2011 (CEST)
