Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Scheme"
From Worms Knowledge Base
(Another suggestion fot the template.) |
(Comment about rubberworm setting box) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I have another suggestion. What about a new section labeled "RubberWorm settings", this way if the scheme is rubber it would be possible to put the RubberWorm settings like: ldet, sdet, fdpt, antisink, etc. If the scheme is not Rubber it's simple: just hide this section. What do you think about it? By the way, I apreciated the last changes in the template. [[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] 17:24, 9 April 2011 (CEST) | I have another suggestion. What about a new section labeled "RubberWorm settings", this way if the scheme is rubber it would be possible to put the RubberWorm settings like: ldet, sdet, fdpt, antisink, etc. If the scheme is not Rubber it's simple: just hide this section. What do you think about it? By the way, I apreciated the last changes in the template. [[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] 17:24, 9 April 2011 (CEST) | ||
| + | * I'd appreciate that because the rubberworm setting stuff wastes many lines in the main content area where it could be easily placed besides on the right. [[User:Pac-Man|Pac-Man]] 18:02, 9 April 2011 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:02, 9 April 2011
Humm... May I suggest something? What do you think about putting a darker line (like the one where is written "Map") in the "Title" part? I think the template would look nicer. FoxHound 17:23, 27 January 2011 (CET)
EDIT: Another point: if you write in the map part "Specially designed map (examples)", the "(examples)" will appear one line below, because the space is not sufficient in one line. With a smaller font size or with a longer length of line, this "problem" would be solved and the template would be even more compact, being much better for the variations. FoxHound 17:46, 27 January 2011 (CET)
I have another suggestion. What about a new section labeled "RubberWorm settings", this way if the scheme is rubber it would be possible to put the RubberWorm settings like: ldet, sdet, fdpt, antisink, etc. If the scheme is not Rubber it's simple: just hide this section. What do you think about it? By the way, I apreciated the last changes in the template. FoxHound 17:24, 9 April 2011 (CEST)
- I'd appreciate that because the rubberworm setting stuff wastes many lines in the main content area where it could be easily placed besides on the right. Pac-Man 18:02, 9 April 2011 (CEST)
