Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Scheme"
From Worms Knowledge Base
(Another suggestion) |
(Another suggestion fot the template.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
EDIT: Another point: if you write in the map part "Specially designed map (examples)", the "(examples)" will appear one line below, because the space is not sufficient in one line. With a smaller font size or with a longer length of line, this "problem" would be solved and the template would be even more compact, being much better for the variations. [[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] 17:46, 27 January 2011 (CET) | EDIT: Another point: if you write in the map part "Specially designed map (examples)", the "(examples)" will appear one line below, because the space is not sufficient in one line. With a smaller font size or with a longer length of line, this "problem" would be solved and the template would be even more compact, being much better for the variations. [[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] 17:46, 27 January 2011 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have another suggestion. What about a new section labeled "RubberWorm settings", this way if the scheme is rubber it would be possible to put the RubberWorm settings like: ldet, sdet, fdpt, antisink, etc. If the scheme is not Rubber it's simple: just hide this section. What do you think about it? By the way, I apreciated the last changes in the template. [[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] 17:24, 9 April 2011 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 15:24, 9 April 2011
Humm... May I suggest something? What do you think about putting a darker line (like the one where is written "Map") in the "Title" part? I think the template would look nicer. FoxHound 17:23, 27 January 2011 (CET)
EDIT: Another point: if you write in the map part "Specially designed map (examples)", the "(examples)" will appear one line below, because the space is not sufficient in one line. With a smaller font size or with a longer length of line, this "problem" would be solved and the template would be even more compact, being much better for the variations. FoxHound 17:46, 27 January 2011 (CET)
I have another suggestion. What about a new section labeled "RubberWorm settings", this way if the scheme is rubber it would be possible to put the RubberWorm settings like: ldet, sdet, fdpt, antisink, etc. If the scheme is not Rubber it's simple: just hide this section. What do you think about it? By the way, I apreciated the last changes in the template. FoxHound 17:24, 9 April 2011 (CEST)
