Difference between revisions of "Talk:Etiquette"
From Worms Knowledge Base
Explorer09 (Talk | contribs) m |
(→Scheme rules: Scheme rules as a new page, and not as a section of Etiquette.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
How about adding the WBA (Wall Before Attack) rule to the Scheme rules-section? I read it very often in wxw hosts, I even began to use it myself if I'm asked for rules. --[[User:Kevin04|Kevin04]] 06:03, 14 July 2008 (MST) | How about adding the WBA (Wall Before Attack) rule to the Scheme rules-section? I read it very often in wxw hosts, I even began to use it myself if I'm asked for rules. --[[User:Kevin04|Kevin04]] 06:03, 14 July 2008 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | === As a new page === | ||
| + | |||
| + | In my opinion "Scheme rules" should be a new page. Etiquette page should be only for etiquette, and not for rules too. Also, I think that the other rules that are not so common or are specific to a single scheme should be included in "Scheme rules" even if the page of the scheme has already everything about its rules. --[[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] 20:26, 25 January 2012 (CET) | ||
== (For hosts) Don't kick players == | == (For hosts) Don't kick players == | ||
Revision as of 19:26, 25 January 2012
Scheme rules
How about adding the WBA (Wall Before Attack) rule to the Scheme rules-section? I read it very often in wxw hosts, I even began to use it myself if I'm asked for rules. --Kevin04 06:03, 14 July 2008 (MST)
As a new page
In my opinion "Scheme rules" should be a new page. Etiquette page should be only for etiquette, and not for rules too. Also, I think that the other rules that are not so common or are specific to a single scheme should be included in "Scheme rules" even if the page of the scheme has already everything about its rules. --FoxHound 20:26, 25 January 2012 (CET)
(For hosts) Don't kick players
Don't kick players. At least, you have to tell the player that you're going to kick him/her and explain the reason before you do.
Idea from this thread.
