Difference between revisions of "Talk:SchemeEddy"

From Worms Knowledge Base

Jump to: navigation, search
m (Signature)
(wat)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
And another ideas that if i remember i will put here. I know that is not simple to do my ideas to the next version, but maybe one of them is possible. Thanks to this program, it's wonderful! [[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] 17:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 
And another ideas that if i remember i will put here. I know that is not simple to do my ideas to the next version, but maybe one of them is possible. Thanks to this program, it's wonderful! [[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] 17:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 +
:You are asking for the impossible, the scheme format which SchemeEddy edits does not control any of these settings. Try asking the [[ProjectX]] guys instead. --[[User:CyberShadow|Vladimir]] 17:42, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:42, 3 June 2010

This program is very, very, very nice! Good work Etho! I would like to know if the next version of it is comming soon. I think that maybe in the future, if possible, should be added to the program another things like:

  1. Set the number of the ammo that a crate contains for each weapon.
  2. Set the power of Low Gravity (higher/smaller jumps).
  3. Set the power and the crate probability of the super weapons. (But maybe this could break rubberworm schemes)

And another ideas that if i remember i will put here. I know that is not simple to do my ideas to the next version, but maybe one of them is possible. Thanks to this program, it's wonderful! FoxHound 17:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

You are asking for the impossible, the scheme format which SchemeEddy edits does not control any of these settings. Try asking the ProjectX guys instead. --Vladimir 17:42, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Personal tools