Difference between revisions of "People/Parker"

From Worms Knowledge Base

Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{ParentArticle|[[People]]}}
 
{{ParentArticle|[[People]]}}
Parker is an angry man who gets angry at Worms
+
Parker is an angry man who gets angry at Worms.
  
 
'''Favourite strategies:'''
 
'''Favourite strategies:'''
Line 13: Line 13:
 
* Claiming the crates are too shit for him to do anything to Run when anyone points this out
 
* Claiming the crates are too shit for him to do anything to Run when anyone points this out
 
* Claiming the crates are too shit for him to carry out any of his promised lolocausts
 
* Claiming the crates are too shit for him to carry out any of his promised lolocausts
 +
 +
<sup>1</sup>victimising them exclusively in a future game
  
 
'''Being Wrong:'''
 
'''Being Wrong:'''
  
Parker is no stranger to being wrong - he does it all the time. Some scientists have suggested that he would be a worthy subject for study due to his apparent state of perpetual wrongness. However, there has only been one known occurance of him actually admitting to being wrong - it was a relatively small point, but still noteworthy due to the fact that known history contains no other events of this kind. The statement came shortly after a claim that Cleveland, Ohio is landlocked, and was uttered thus:
+
Parker is no stranger to being wrong - he does it all the time. Some scientists have suggested that he would be a worthy subject for study due to his apparent state of perpetual wrongness. However, there has only been one known occurance of him actually admitting to being wrong - it was a relatively small point, but still noteworthy due to the fact that known history contains no other events of this kind.  
"oh i'd be wrong"
+
  
 
+
The statement came shortly after a claim that the city of Cleveland, Ohio is landlocked. Once Parker had made the discovery that this was incorrect, he uttered the following admission:
<sup>1</sup>victimising them exclusively in a future game
+
"oh i'd be wrong"

Latest revision as of 16:52, 29 November 2008

(Up to People)

Parker is an angry man who gets angry at Worms.

Favourite strategies:

  • Pointing out that Run is in the lead
  • Trying to convince everyone to attack Run
  • Pointing out that even when Run isn't in the lead, he's guaranteed to get a Scales of Justice and win the game
  • Moaning at anyone who doesn't do everything possible to attack Run
  • Threatening to lolocaust1 them
  • Blaming them when Run wins
  • Collecting crates instead of making any effort himself to attack Run
  • Claiming the crates are too shit for him to do anything to Run when anyone points this out
  • Claiming the crates are too shit for him to carry out any of his promised lolocausts

1victimising them exclusively in a future game

Being Wrong:

Parker is no stranger to being wrong - he does it all the time. Some scientists have suggested that he would be a worthy subject for study due to his apparent state of perpetual wrongness. However, there has only been one known occurance of him actually admitting to being wrong - it was a relatively small point, but still noteworthy due to the fact that known history contains no other events of this kind.

The statement came shortly after a claim that the city of Cleveland, Ohio is landlocked. Once Parker had made the discovery that this was incorrect, he uttered the following admission: "oh i'd be wrong"

Personal tools