Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dream17"

From Worms Knowledge Base

Jump to: navigation, search
(reply)
(Dead?)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
The link, at least, is dead.  Is the site itself completely dead?  -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 17:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 
The link, at least, is dead.  Is the site itself completely dead?  -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 17:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 
:I've found the new location with the help of my old friend, Google.  The article has been updated accordingly.  Also, I removed the blurb Spectre had edited into the article which didn't fit into an informative setting like a knowledge base.  -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 18:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 
:I've found the new location with the help of my old friend, Google.  The article has been updated accordingly.  Also, I removed the blurb Spectre had edited into the article which didn't fit into an informative setting like a knowledge base.  -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 18:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
:Look at the site's news, Lex. It seems like the new domain was bought recently, because the news was dated 12 May 2010 (yesterday). --[[User:Explorer09|Explorer09]] 13:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
+
::Look at the site's news, Lex. It seems like the new domain was bought recently, because the news was dated 12 May 2010 (yesterday). --[[User:Explorer09|Explorer09]] 13:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 +
:::The new domain was online and reachable as of 23rd of May, 23:04. Reacquisition of the original one will probably be futile, as it's now occupied by one of these fake pages, trying to sell you "real" watches. :P  --[[User:Bonz|bonz]] 21:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
== Removing "Wikipedia incident" ==
 +
Don't restore garbage to our wiki.  Nobody cares if a Wikipedia article was removed.  It's not an "incident" worth pointing out on an informative wiki.  Don't do it again.  -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 16:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 +
:I see. But please, if you're removing something from the page, mention why you want to do so. Otherwise, I (or possibly someone else) may try to revert the page for what has been deleted. --[[User:Explorer09|Explorer09]] 12:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 +
::I did.  My exact quote is "Also, I removed the blurb Spectre had edited into the article which didn't fit into an informative setting like a knowledge base." and is written on this very page in relation to this article. -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 18:35, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:16, 1 September 2010

Dead?

The link, at least, is dead. Is the site itself completely dead? -Lex 17:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

I've found the new location with the help of my old friend, Google. The article has been updated accordingly. Also, I removed the blurb Spectre had edited into the article which didn't fit into an informative setting like a knowledge base. -Lex 18:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Look at the site's news, Lex. It seems like the new domain was bought recently, because the news was dated 12 May 2010 (yesterday). --Explorer09 13:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
The new domain was online and reachable as of 23rd of May, 23:04. Reacquisition of the original one will probably be futile, as it's now occupied by one of these fake pages, trying to sell you "real" watches. :P --bonz 21:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Removing "Wikipedia incident"

Don't restore garbage to our wiki. Nobody cares if a Wikipedia article was removed. It's not an "incident" worth pointing out on an informative wiki. Don't do it again. -Lex 16:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

I see. But please, if you're removing something from the page, mention why you want to do so. Otherwise, I (or possibly someone else) may try to revert the page for what has been deleted. --Explorer09 12:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
I did. My exact quote is "Also, I removed the blurb Spectre had edited into the article which didn't fit into an informative setting like a knowledge base." and is written on this very page in relation to this article. -Lex 18:35, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Personal tools