Difference between revisions of "People/Parker"

From Worms Knowledge Base

Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Parker is an angry man who gets angry at Worms
+
{{ParentArticle|[[People]]}}
 +
Parker is an angry man who gets angry at Worms.
  
 
'''Favourite strategies:'''
 
'''Favourite strategies:'''
Line 7: Line 8:
 
* Pointing out that even when Run isn't in the lead, he's guaranteed to get a Scales of Justice and win the game
 
* Pointing out that even when Run isn't in the lead, he's guaranteed to get a Scales of Justice and win the game
 
* Moaning at anyone who doesn't do everything possible to attack Run
 
* Moaning at anyone who doesn't do everything possible to attack Run
* Threatening to lolocaust* them
+
* Threatening to lolocaust<sup>1</sup> them
 
* Blaming them when Run wins
 
* Blaming them when Run wins
 
* Collecting crates instead of making any effort himself to attack Run
 
* Collecting crates instead of making any effort himself to attack Run
* Claiming the crates are too shit for him to do anything when anyone points this out
+
* Claiming the crates are too shit for him to do anything to Run when anyone points this out
* Parkercausting - promising someone a lolocaust and then spectacularly failing to deliver one, blaming "crap crates"
+
* Claiming the crates are too shit for him to carry out any of his promised lolocausts
  
 +
<sup>1</sup>victimising them exclusively in a future game
  
 +
'''Being Wrong:'''
  
:*victimising them exclusively in a future game
+
Parker is no stranger to being wrong - he does it all the time. Some scientists have suggested that he would be a worthy subject for study due to his apparent state of perpetual wrongness. However, there has only been one known occurance of him actually admitting to being wrong - it was a relatively small point, but still noteworthy due to the fact that known history contains no other events of this kind.
 +
 
 +
The statement came shortly after a claim that the city of Cleveland, Ohio is landlocked. Once Parker had made the discovery that this was incorrect, he uttered the following admission:
 +
"oh i'd be wrong"

Latest revision as of 16:52, 29 November 2008

(Up to People)

Parker is an angry man who gets angry at Worms.

Favourite strategies:

  • Pointing out that Run is in the lead
  • Trying to convince everyone to attack Run
  • Pointing out that even when Run isn't in the lead, he's guaranteed to get a Scales of Justice and win the game
  • Moaning at anyone who doesn't do everything possible to attack Run
  • Threatening to lolocaust1 them
  • Blaming them when Run wins
  • Collecting crates instead of making any effort himself to attack Run
  • Claiming the crates are too shit for him to do anything to Run when anyone points this out
  • Claiming the crates are too shit for him to carry out any of his promised lolocausts

1victimising them exclusively in a future game

Being Wrong:

Parker is no stranger to being wrong - he does it all the time. Some scientists have suggested that he would be a worthy subject for study due to his apparent state of perpetual wrongness. However, there has only been one known occurance of him actually admitting to being wrong - it was a relatively small point, but still noteworthy due to the fact that known history contains no other events of this kind.

The statement came shortly after a claim that the city of Cleveland, Ohio is landlocked. Once Parker had made the discovery that this was incorrect, he uttered the following admission: "oh i'd be wrong"

Personal tools