User talk:The Assassin47

Hi, thank you for your participation. However, I've recently undone one of your edits, with an explanation in the edit summary ("Mole Shopper is not a roping scheme"), and you've changed it back without any explanation.

Please note the following:

1. Please enter an edit summary when you make changes. It helps other editors understand your edits.
2. Check the page's "history" tab before restoring a reverted edit.
3. If you have any questions, ask them on the page's "discussion" tab, or on users' talk pages.
4. Check the wiki's Recent changes once in a while, as some edits may be follow-ups to your edits.

--Vladimir 07:09, 29 August 2011 (CEST)

Hey Cyber. Youre right its not a roping scheme, but I was trying to place it in the Shopping schemes. Its definitely non-conventional, perhaps it should be placed in the Other Schemes section? Sorry to undo your edit, I thought maybe mine didnt save. --The Assassin47 07:13, 29 August 2011 (CEST)

I think Mole Shopper is no less conventional than Team17 or Hysteria. The biggest thing that stands out is that it requires a non-random map, but I don't think it's as distanced from "conventional gameplay" as the other schemes there, like Golf or Walk for Weapons.

Anyway, the Schemes page has a long history of edits and revisions, and generally represents a more-or-less established consensus (although KRD User:KoreanRedDragon/Schemes might disagree). Changes should probably be discussed on the talk page first. --Vladimir 07:20, 29 August 2011 (CEST)