Difference between revisions of "Talk:Worms Armageddon"
From Worms Knowledge Base
Madewokherd (Talk | contribs) ({{sofixit}} ~~~~) |
CyberShadow (Talk | contribs) (Reorganisation) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Why are programmers mentioned particularly? There are many other contributers to W:A who didn't program and have provided more to the community. Why mention only programmers and not contributers in the first place. --[[User:Evil Bunny]] | Why are programmers mentioned particularly? There are many other contributers to W:A who didn't program and have provided more to the community. Why mention only programmers and not contributers in the first place. --[[User:Evil Bunny]] | ||
* Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Blah blah blah click the edit link etc. My guess is it's because programmers are a relatively small group, it's easy to decide who belongs there, and well this wiki is currently mostly populated by programmers. If you have a more balanced way to list wormers in mind, go ahead and try it out. It's good to see you've added some non-programming info elsewhere btw. --[[User:Madewokherd|Madewokherd]] 20:09, 8 October 2006 (MST) | * Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Blah blah blah click the edit link etc. My guess is it's because programmers are a relatively small group, it's easy to decide who belongs there, and well this wiki is currently mostly populated by programmers. If you have a more balanced way to list wormers in mind, go ahead and try it out. It's good to see you've added some non-programming info elsewhere btw. --[[User:Madewokherd|Madewokherd]] 20:09, 8 October 2006 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Reorganisation == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The games' pages should be split and organized into something like this: | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:Wkb-games.png]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Currently everything is just piled up here. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The list of programmers/whatever is useless; people should be known by their deeds (program pages, etc). Also, it spawns some controversy (people that did a lot for the community but aren't coders are also important, etc.) | ||
Revision as of 13:17, 21 June 2007
About "Unsorted"
I wasn't really sure if I should have made a "Macros" section (for Constipated Silkworm), because Silkworm would have to be in that section too, because of its versions before 4.00. Also, I'm not really sure of the nature of Buttfats & Parsnips, though I suspect it should go in the WormNET proxies section. Lex 13:49, 11 July 2006 (MST)
- I have changed "Unsorted" to "Misc", in correspondance to Seita's addition of a "Misc" section in the WWP 3rd-party programs section. Lex 05:07, 21 July 2006 (MST)
Online play section move
I think the "Online play" section should go by the communities section instead of where it is for the following reasons:
- It has nothing to do with the game technology, which is the section it's been placed by as of this message.
- Someone looking for community-related information would be looking past the technical articles which are the main focus of the wiki.
I really hope someone reads this. :/ Lex 05:04, 21 July 2006 (MST)
Why programmers?
Why are programmers mentioned particularly? There are many other contributers to W:A who didn't program and have provided more to the community. Why mention only programmers and not contributers in the first place. --User:Evil Bunny
- Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Blah blah blah click the edit link etc. My guess is it's because programmers are a relatively small group, it's easy to decide who belongs there, and well this wiki is currently mostly populated by programmers. If you have a more balanced way to list wormers in mind, go ahead and try it out. It's good to see you've added some non-programming info elsewhere btw. --Madewokherd 20:09, 8 October 2006 (MST)
Reorganisation
The games' pages should be split and organized into something like this:
Currently everything is just piled up here.
The list of programmers/whatever is useless; people should be known by their deeds (program pages, etc). Also, it spawns some controversy (people that did a lot for the community but aren't coders are also important, etc.)
