Difference between revisions of "Talk:Soundbanks"
From Worms Knowledge Base
(start talking about WWP soundbanks) |
(add response to WWP soundbanks inquiry) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== WWP soundbanks? == | == WWP soundbanks? == | ||
there are a couple of additional foreign language soundbanks in WWP, should they be included here too, along with the transcriptions/translation subentries? [[User:TheMadCharles|TheMadCharles]] ([[User talk:TheMadCharles|talk]]) 20:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC) | there are a couple of additional foreign language soundbanks in WWP, should they be included here too, along with the transcriptions/translation subentries? [[User:TheMadCharles|TheMadCharles]] ([[User talk:TheMadCharles|talk]]) 20:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Yes, they should be included. Please feel free to add them. -[[User:Lex|Lex]] ([[User talk:Lex|talk]]) 18:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:45, 12 February 2023
Descriptions
Where are these descriptions from? I didn't see any of these text in the Soundbank editor. --Explorer09 05:52, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
- They're in the names.wdb file. I'm not sure if they're actually exposed to the user interface, possibly due to a bug. --Vladimir 06:52, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Used but Unused
There's an "Unused sounds" section, and in the "Soundbank sounds and meaning" there's the four files that have been disabled since the 3.6.29.0 Beta: Excellent, Perfect, Amazing and Brilliant. Aren't these unused too? Is there a reason not to move them under "Unused sounds"? --OutofOrder 19:26, 23 September 2012 (CEST)
WWP soundbanks?
there are a couple of additional foreign language soundbanks in WWP, should they be included here too, along with the transcriptions/translation subentries? TheMadCharles (talk) 20:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
