Difference between revisions of "Talk:Worms 2 Plus"
From Worms Knowledge Base
(→Remove "contributors" from "developers" box: new section) |
(Response to "Remove 'contributors' from 'developers' box") |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'm not sure why developers of the software / utilities _bundled_ in this obvious copyright violation are listed as developers - it reads like they developed towards or specifically for this copyright violation. At least I personally do not want to have anything to do with that copyright violation. Plus, they're already listed in the bulleted list in the main text of this copyright violation's page. With this logic you'd also have to list all the people having worked on the MSVC compiler etc. since they're all "developers" of this copyright violation. So I suggest just removing the names from the infobox of this copyright violation and only keeping the name of the guy creating this copyright violation. Did I say copyright violation? - [[User:Pac-Man|Pac-Man]] ([[User talk:Pac-Man|talk]]) 15:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC) | I'm not sure why developers of the software / utilities _bundled_ in this obvious copyright violation are listed as developers - it reads like they developed towards or specifically for this copyright violation. At least I personally do not want to have anything to do with that copyright violation. Plus, they're already listed in the bulleted list in the main text of this copyright violation's page. With this logic you'd also have to list all the people having worked on the MSVC compiler etc. since they're all "developers" of this copyright violation. So I suggest just removing the names from the infobox of this copyright violation and only keeping the name of the guy creating this copyright violation. Did I say copyright violation? - [[User:Pac-Man|Pac-Man]] ([[User talk:Pac-Man|talk]]) 15:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Good point! -[[User:Lex|Lex]] ([[User talk:Lex|talk]]) 17:15, 20 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:15, 20 August 2020
Remove "contributors" from "developers" box
I'm not sure why developers of the software / utilities _bundled_ in this obvious copyright violation are listed as developers - it reads like they developed towards or specifically for this copyright violation. At least I personally do not want to have anything to do with that copyright violation. Plus, they're already listed in the bulleted list in the main text of this copyright violation's page. With this logic you'd also have to list all the people having worked on the MSVC compiler etc. since they're all "developers" of this copyright violation. So I suggest just removing the names from the infobox of this copyright violation and only keeping the name of the guy creating this copyright violation. Did I say copyright violation? - Pac-Man (talk) 15:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
