Difference between revisions of "People/Parker"

From Worms Knowledge Base

Jump to: navigation, search
m (ParentArticle template)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
* Claiming the crates are too shit for him to do anything to Run when anyone points this out
 
* Claiming the crates are too shit for him to do anything to Run when anyone points this out
 
* Claiming the crates are too shit for him to carry out any of his promised lolocausts
 
* Claiming the crates are too shit for him to carry out any of his promised lolocausts
 +
 +
'''Being Wrong:'''
 +
 +
Parker is no stranger to being wrong - he does it all the time. Some scientists have suggested that he would be a worthy subject for study due to his apparent state of perpetual wrongness. However, there has only been one known occurance of him actually admitting to being wrong - it was a relatively small point, but still noteworthy due to the fact that known history contains no other events of this kind. The statement came shortly after a claim that Cleveland, Ohio is landlocked, and was uttered thus:
 +
"oh i'd be wrong"
 +
  
 
<sup>1</sup>victimising them exclusively in a future game
 
<sup>1</sup>victimising them exclusively in a future game

Revision as of 16:38, 7 October 2008

(Up to People)

Parker is an angry man who gets angry at Worms

Favourite strategies:

  • Pointing out that Run is in the lead
  • Trying to convince everyone to attack Run
  • Pointing out that even when Run isn't in the lead, he's guaranteed to get a Scales of Justice and win the game
  • Moaning at anyone who doesn't do everything possible to attack Run
  • Threatening to lolocaust1 them
  • Blaming them when Run wins
  • Collecting crates instead of making any effort himself to attack Run
  • Claiming the crates are too shit for him to do anything to Run when anyone points this out
  • Claiming the crates are too shit for him to carry out any of his promised lolocausts

Being Wrong:

Parker is no stranger to being wrong - he does it all the time. Some scientists have suggested that he would be a worthy subject for study due to his apparent state of perpetual wrongness. However, there has only been one known occurance of him actually admitting to being wrong - it was a relatively small point, but still noteworthy due to the fact that known history contains no other events of this kind. The statement came shortly after a claim that Cleveland, Ohio is landlocked, and was uttered thus: "oh i'd be wrong"


1victimising them exclusively in a future game

Personal tools