Difference between revisions of "People/Parker"
From Worms Knowledge Base
m (ParentArticle template) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Claiming the crates are too shit for him to do anything to Run when anyone points this out | * Claiming the crates are too shit for him to do anything to Run when anyone points this out | ||
* Claiming the crates are too shit for him to carry out any of his promised lolocausts | * Claiming the crates are too shit for him to carry out any of his promised lolocausts | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Being Wrong:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Parker is no stranger to being wrong - he does it all the time. Some scientists have suggested that he would be a worthy subject for study due to his apparent state of perpetual wrongness. However, there has only been one known occurance of him actually admitting to being wrong - it was a relatively small point, but still noteworthy due to the fact that known history contains no other events of this kind. The statement came shortly after a claim that Cleveland, Ohio is landlocked, and was uttered thus: | ||
+ | "oh i'd be wrong" | ||
+ | |||
<sup>1</sup>victimising them exclusively in a future game | <sup>1</sup>victimising them exclusively in a future game |
Revision as of 16:38, 7 October 2008
(Up to People)
Parker is an angry man who gets angry at Worms
Favourite strategies:
- Pointing out that Run is in the lead
- Trying to convince everyone to attack Run
- Pointing out that even when Run isn't in the lead, he's guaranteed to get a Scales of Justice and win the game
- Moaning at anyone who doesn't do everything possible to attack Run
- Threatening to lolocaust1 them
- Blaming them when Run wins
- Collecting crates instead of making any effort himself to attack Run
- Claiming the crates are too shit for him to do anything to Run when anyone points this out
- Claiming the crates are too shit for him to carry out any of his promised lolocausts
Being Wrong:
Parker is no stranger to being wrong - he does it all the time. Some scientists have suggested that he would be a worthy subject for study due to his apparent state of perpetual wrongness. However, there has only been one known occurance of him actually admitting to being wrong - it was a relatively small point, but still noteworthy due to the fact that known history contains no other events of this kind. The statement came shortly after a claim that Cleveland, Ohio is landlocked, and was uttered thus: "oh i'd be wrong"
1victimising them exclusively in a future game