Difference between revisions of "Talk:Darts"
From Worms Knowledge Base
(why not move this to an official page?) |
(Thanks, LeTotalKiller.) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You did a nice work here. This information should be added to an official Darts page. There are many stub pages here in WKB, this page has a lot of information already. May you transform it into an official page? --[[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] ([[User talk:FoxHound|talk]]) 19:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC) | You did a nice work here. This information should be added to an official Darts page. There are many stub pages here in WKB, this page has a lot of information already. May you transform it into an official page? --[[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] ([[User talk:FoxHound|talk]]) 19:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Hello, and thank you for your feedback. I didn't move the page at the time because I thought it were missing a couple crucial sections (like some sort of strategy section? But I can't tell what exactly to put in it), plus I was trying to get the dS community involved in the making of the article, and in particular I was waiting for some sort of "official" green light from them. Anyway, I'll move it, it's clearly not that much of a stub indeed. --[[User:LeTotalKiller|LeTotalKiller]] ([[User talk:LeTotalKiller|talk]]) 20:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | Thanks. I believe it is easier to people edit it now and put those missing details there. With this information appearing in [[Schemes]] page more people will have access to the scheme. --[[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] ([[User talk:FoxHound|talk]]) 21:10, 23 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:10, 23 January 2017
You did a nice work here. This information should be added to an official Darts page. There are many stub pages here in WKB, this page has a lot of information already. May you transform it into an official page? --FoxHound (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, and thank you for your feedback. I didn't move the page at the time because I thought it were missing a couple crucial sections (like some sort of strategy section? But I can't tell what exactly to put in it), plus I was trying to get the dS community involved in the making of the article, and in particular I was waiting for some sort of "official" green light from them. Anyway, I'll move it, it's clearly not that much of a stub indeed. --LeTotalKiller (talk) 20:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I believe it is easier to people edit it now and put those missing details there. With this information appearing in Schemes page more people will have access to the scheme. --FoxHound (talk) 21:10, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
