Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dream17"
From Worms Knowledge Base
(→Dead?) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The link, at least, is dead. Is the site itself completely dead? -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 17:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | The link, at least, is dead. Is the site itself completely dead? -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 17:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I've found the new location with the help of my old friend, Google. The article has been updated accordingly. Also, I removed the blurb Spectre had edited into the article which didn't fit into an informative setting like a knowledge base. -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 18:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | :I've found the new location with the help of my old friend, Google. The article has been updated accordingly. Also, I removed the blurb Spectre had edited into the article which didn't fit into an informative setting like a knowledge base. -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 18:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Look at the site's news, Lex. It seems like the new domain was bought recently, because the news was dated 12 May 2010 (yesterday). --[[User:Explorer09|Explorer09]] 13:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::The new domain was online and reachable as of 23rd of May, 23:04. Reacquisition of the original one will probably be futile, as it's now occupied by one of these fake pages, trying to sell you "real" watches. :P --[[User:Bonz|bonz]] 21:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Removing "Wikipedia incident" == | ||
| + | Don't restore garbage to our wiki. Nobody cares if a Wikipedia article was removed. It's not an "incident" worth pointing out on an informative wiki. Don't do it again. -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 16:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I see. But please, if you're removing something from the page, mention why you want to do so. Otherwise, I (or possibly someone else) may try to revert the page for what has been deleted. --[[User:Explorer09|Explorer09]] 12:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::I did. My exact quote is "Also, I removed the blurb Spectre had edited into the article which didn't fit into an informative setting like a knowledge base." and is written on this very page in relation to this article. -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 18:35, 17 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:16, 1 September 2010
Dead?
The link, at least, is dead. Is the site itself completely dead? -Lex 17:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- I've found the new location with the help of my old friend, Google. The article has been updated accordingly. Also, I removed the blurb Spectre had edited into the article which didn't fit into an informative setting like a knowledge base. -Lex 18:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Look at the site's news, Lex. It seems like the new domain was bought recently, because the news was dated 12 May 2010 (yesterday). --Explorer09 13:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- The new domain was online and reachable as of 23rd of May, 23:04. Reacquisition of the original one will probably be futile, as it's now occupied by one of these fake pages, trying to sell you "real" watches. :P --bonz 21:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- Look at the site's news, Lex. It seems like the new domain was bought recently, because the news was dated 12 May 2010 (yesterday). --Explorer09 13:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Removing "Wikipedia incident"
Don't restore garbage to our wiki. Nobody cares if a Wikipedia article was removed. It's not an "incident" worth pointing out on an informative wiki. Don't do it again. -Lex 16:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- I see. But please, if you're removing something from the page, mention why you want to do so. Otherwise, I (or possibly someone else) may try to revert the page for what has been deleted. --Explorer09 12:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- I did. My exact quote is "Also, I removed the blurb Spectre had edited into the article which didn't fit into an informative setting like a knowledge base." and is written on this very page in relation to this article. -Lex 18:35, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
