Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dream17"
From Worms Knowledge Base
Explorer09 (Talk | contribs) (reply) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The link, at least, is dead. Is the site itself completely dead? -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 17:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | The link, at least, is dead. Is the site itself completely dead? -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 17:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I've found the new location with the help of my old friend, Google. The article has been updated accordingly. Also, I removed the blurb Spectre had edited into the article which didn't fit into an informative setting like a knowledge base. -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 18:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | :I've found the new location with the help of my old friend, Google. The article has been updated accordingly. Also, I removed the blurb Spectre had edited into the article which didn't fit into an informative setting like a knowledge base. -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 18:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | :Look at the site's news, Lex. It seems like the new domain was bought recently, because the news was dated 12 May 2010 (yesterday). --[[User:Explorer09|Explorer09]] 13:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC) | + | ::Look at the site's news, Lex. It seems like the new domain was bought recently, because the news was dated 12 May 2010 (yesterday). --[[User:Explorer09|Explorer09]] 13:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC) |
| + | :::Don't restore garbage to our wiki. Nobody cares if a Wikipedia article was removed. It's not an "incident" worth pointing out on an informative wiki. Don't do it again. -[[User:Lex|Lex]] 16:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:30, 13 May 2010
Dead?
The link, at least, is dead. Is the site itself completely dead? -Lex 17:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- I've found the new location with the help of my old friend, Google. The article has been updated accordingly. Also, I removed the blurb Spectre had edited into the article which didn't fit into an informative setting like a knowledge base. -Lex 18:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Look at the site's news, Lex. It seems like the new domain was bought recently, because the news was dated 12 May 2010 (yesterday). --Explorer09 13:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Don't restore garbage to our wiki. Nobody cares if a Wikipedia article was removed. It's not an "incident" worth pointing out on an informative wiki. Don't do it again. -Lex 16:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Look at the site's news, Lex. It seems like the new domain was bought recently, because the news was dated 12 May 2010 (yesterday). --Explorer09 13:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
