View source for Talk:WeaponXpress

Forgive me, but is this scheme notable? It seems to be new because there is the wdca setting (a new feature of [[RubberWorm]]) in the replay file. The page [[Schemes]] is for notable schemes. Ideas must be moved to the page [[Scheme ideas]], please understand that there are many people that create schemes that couldn't put schemes on Schemes page, even [[User:Run!|Run]] that have lots of famous schemes respected this concept and put his new scheme called [[Scramble]] there (Scheme ideas). It's just not fair to see a new scheme on Schemes page when there are many people that couldn't put their schemes there. [[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] 17:44, 9 April 2011 (CEST)
: Hi, you are correct. I will move the links to the scheme ideas page (didn't know one exists since the link is very small and hidden at the bottom...). Actually, I was also playing this on WWP alot (with the wormpot sdet-option) so it's about 3 years old by now. [[User:Pac-Man|Pac-Man]] 17:57, 9 April 2011 (CEST)

::Thanks for your attention. so, the scheme is old, but not famous yet. Sorry about this, I tried many times to make Scheme ideas become a section on [[Schemes]] page, but unfortunately, the other editors didn't like the idea and insist to put Scheme ideas hidden at the botton as "See also". By the way good scheme, but I think that if people think more before the attacks and don't put thousands of weapons randomly, it would be easier to kill the opponent worms and don't kill your own worms. [[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] 18:24, 9 April 2011 (CEST)

::: Hi, I saw people trying to play with some kind of strategy, but the overpowered weapons kill that (which is wanted by me ;D) and worms fly different than expected. The baseball bat is removed, which makes it harder to target the small holes in the wall (I forgot to add that point to the list of removed weapons). [[User:Pac-Man|Pac-Man]] 18:28, 9 April 2011 (CEST)