Difference between revisions of "User talk:Explorer09"

From Worms Knowledge Base

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
[[User:Deadcode|Deadcode]] 00:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 
[[User:Deadcode|Deadcode]] 00:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
:1. Because I'm using 1024x768 resolution, and I usually think that the 48x48 icons in Windows Explorer looks good for me. However, if you prefer, you can change them to 64x64 (and I don't mind that).
 +
 +
Also, if you can make the image whose size are multiples of 64 (like 128x128), do it. Because it'll be less blurry when down-sampling.
 +
[[User:Explorer09|Explorer09]] 01:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:03, 12 July 2009

First of all, thank you for your active and industrious work on WKB.

I would like to ask why you changed the weapon boxes to resample all icons larger than 48x48 down to 48x48. (Admittedly Weapon_longname was a quick hack, but I thought the fix would've been to give Template:Weapon a width parameter.) Doing a marginal resample like this creates a significant amount of blurring, and if 48x48 is indeed going to be the size limit on weapon info box icons, then I will want to recreate all the extra-large icons at 48x48 so that they don't have to be doubly resampled. But please, explain to me why 64x64 is too large.

Deadcode 00:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Because I'm using 1024x768 resolution, and I usually think that the 48x48 icons in Windows Explorer looks good for me. However, if you prefer, you can change them to 64x64 (and I don't mind that).

Also, if you can make the image whose size are multiples of 64 (like 128x128), do it. Because it'll be less blurry when down-sampling. Explorer09 01:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools