Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Scheme"

From Worms Knowledge Base

Jump to: navigation, search
(Another suggestion fot the template.)
(Comment about rubberworm setting box)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
I have another suggestion. What about a new section labeled "RubberWorm settings", this way if the scheme is rubber it would be possible to put the RubberWorm settings like: ldet, sdet, fdpt, antisink, etc. If the scheme is not Rubber it's simple: just hide this section. What do you think about it? By the way, I apreciated the last changes in the template. [[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] 17:24, 9 April 2011 (CEST)
 
I have another suggestion. What about a new section labeled "RubberWorm settings", this way if the scheme is rubber it would be possible to put the RubberWorm settings like: ldet, sdet, fdpt, antisink, etc. If the scheme is not Rubber it's simple: just hide this section. What do you think about it? By the way, I apreciated the last changes in the template. [[User:FoxHound|FoxHound]] 17:24, 9 April 2011 (CEST)
 +
* I'd appreciate that because the rubberworm setting stuff wastes many lines in the main content area where it could be easily placed besides on the right. [[User:Pac-Man|Pac-Man]] 18:02, 9 April 2011 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 16:02, 9 April 2011

Humm... May I suggest something? What do you think about putting a darker line (like the one where is written "Map") in the "Title" part? I think the template would look nicer. FoxHound 17:23, 27 January 2011 (CET)

EDIT: Another point: if you write in the map part "Specially designed map (examples)", the "(examples)" will appear one line below, because the space is not sufficient in one line. With a smaller font size or with a longer length of line, this "problem" would be solved and the template would be even more compact, being much better for the variations. FoxHound 17:46, 27 January 2011 (CET)

I have another suggestion. What about a new section labeled "RubberWorm settings", this way if the scheme is rubber it would be possible to put the RubberWorm settings like: ldet, sdet, fdpt, antisink, etc. If the scheme is not Rubber it's simple: just hide this section. What do you think about it? By the way, I apreciated the last changes in the template. FoxHound 17:24, 9 April 2011 (CEST)

  • I'd appreciate that because the rubberworm setting stuff wastes many lines in the main content area where it could be easily placed besides on the right. Pac-Man 18:02, 9 April 2011 (CEST)
Personal tools