Difference between revisions of "Talk:Soundbanks"
From Worms Knowledge Base
OutofOrder (Talk | contribs) (→Used but Unused: new section) |
OutofOrder (Talk | contribs) m (Deleting a somehow duplicated section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
There's an "Unused sounds" section, and in the "Soundbank sounds and meaning" there's the four files that have been disabled since the 3.6.29.0 Beta: Excellent, Perfect, Amazing and Brilliant. Aren't these unused too? Is there a reason not to move them under "Unused sounds"? --[[User:OutofOrder|OutofOrder]] 19:26, 23 September 2012 (CEST) | There's an "Unused sounds" section, and in the "Soundbank sounds and meaning" there's the four files that have been disabled since the 3.6.29.0 Beta: Excellent, Perfect, Amazing and Brilliant. Aren't these unused too? Is there a reason not to move them under "Unused sounds"? --[[User:OutofOrder|OutofOrder]] 19:26, 23 September 2012 (CEST) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 17:35, 23 September 2012
Descriptions
Where are these descriptions from? I didn't see any of these text in the Soundbank editor. --Explorer09 05:52, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
- They're in the names.wdb file. I'm not sure if they're actually exposed to the user interface, possibly due to a bug. --Vladimir 06:52, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Used but Unused
There's an "Unused sounds" section, and in the "Soundbank sounds and meaning" there's the four files that have been disabled since the 3.6.29.0 Beta: Excellent, Perfect, Amazing and Brilliant. Aren't these unused too? Is there a reason not to move them under "Unused sounds"? --OutofOrder 19:26, 23 September 2012 (CEST)
