Difference between revisions of "Talk:Old Main Page"

From Worms Knowledge Base

Jump to: navigation, search
 
m (oops)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
I've decided against categories for the knowledge base. Categories are required only when the articles aren't hierarchically linked - however, this isn't the case here since information is strictly categorized on the respective pages (e.g. WKB -> W:A -> Game logic/internal stuff -> File formats -> .BIT). So categories would simply add the overhead and nuisance to maintain all articles from a respective category in the category itself. Also the category pages don't make any sense since the categorizing pages already ARE a list of articles in the "category".
 
I've decided against categories for the knowledge base. Categories are required only when the articles aren't hierarchically linked - however, this isn't the case here since information is strictly categorized on the respective pages (e.g. WKB -> W:A -> Game logic/internal stuff -> File formats -> .BIT). So categories would simply add the overhead and nuisance to maintain all articles from a respective category in the category itself. Also the category pages don't make any sense since the categorizing pages already ARE a list of articles in the "category".
  
[[User:Run!]] ([[Special:Contributions/Run!|contributions]]) tried to add a set of categories that perform a different type of categorization. For example, [[Graphics directory]] (the file format) and the programs [[WA directory editor]] and [[WormsBackup]] are both in [[Category:Directories]]; although these articles do have something in common, it is very unlikely for someone to actually use this category navigation system to navigate around the wiki - and so, the such a loosely defined category system doesn't add much structure to the wiki.
+
[[User:Run!]] ([[Special:Contributions/Run!|contributions]]) tried to add a set of categories that perform a different type of categorization. For example, [[Graphics directory]] (the file format) and the programs [[WA directory editor]] and [[WormsBackup]] are both in [http://wiki.thecybershadow.net/Category:Directories Category:Directories]; although these articles do have something in common, it is very unlikely for someone to actually use this category navigation system to navigate around the wiki - and so, such a loosely defined category system doesn't add much structure to the wiki.
  
 
Instead, how about using a template to specify the parent article? Check out [[Sandbox]] for an example.
 
Instead, how about using a template to specify the parent article? Check out [[Sandbox]] for an example.

Revision as of 18:50, 23 July 2006

Categories

I've decided against categories for the knowledge base. Categories are required only when the articles aren't hierarchically linked - however, this isn't the case here since information is strictly categorized on the respective pages (e.g. WKB -> W:A -> Game logic/internal stuff -> File formats -> .BIT). So categories would simply add the overhead and nuisance to maintain all articles from a respective category in the category itself. Also the category pages don't make any sense since the categorizing pages already ARE a list of articles in the "category".

User:Run! (contributions) tried to add a set of categories that perform a different type of categorization. For example, Graphics directory (the file format) and the programs WA directory editor and WormsBackup are both in Category:Directories; although these articles do have something in common, it is very unlikely for someone to actually use this category navigation system to navigate around the wiki - and so, such a loosely defined category system doesn't add much structure to the wiki.

Instead, how about using a template to specify the parent article? Check out Sandbox for an example.

Vladimir 11:46, 23 July 2006 (MST)

Personal tools